ST 105 003

The straight lugs, plus the patina of the dial... Desirable. Best, Nicolas

This reference is magic, and a bit mysterious as it is a kind of transitional one, between the CK 2998 and the ST 105 003. Made only during one year or two. Rarer than any other CK, being 2915 or 2998. Add a nice patina, like this one, and you have someth

. . . from the collection of the original owner. Same guy also has a Ploprof. Watch this space.

A nice, very nice one I could see in Paris during one of our GTGs. I am not expert enough, but this one seems to be correct, maybe with the exception of the crown which should be Naiad? Best, Nicolas

Was super happy to find this fantastic example of the transitional 105.002 Not many are aware of this reference which production lasted less than a year, some say 6 months. Identical to the 2998-62 although some 105.002 were also fitted with baton hands l

. . . of photos; which can you identify? R S T U V W What I can say with a high degree of probablity is that there were examples of 2915, 2998, 105.002, 105.003, 105.012, and 145.012 present. There are some obvious models here, but others will require inf

. . . my decision for the re-issue, Nicolas. In the abstract, an original 2915 / 2998 / 105.002 / 105.003 / 105.012 / 145.012 would have been preferable. But because Omega made an effort to resurrect the legend, which was a gesture to the collector commun

Credit: Brevetwatch.

. . . around 1969. I think - and may be wrong about this - that all cal 321 Speedmasters had DON bezels, which then carried over to the first range of transitional cal 861 models and were replaced with DNN bezels sometime in 1969. DON vs DNN is an issue t

The Omega Speedmaster is a design classic and should be viewed in the same way as the Leica Camera, the Eames Chair and the Corvette Stingray. All of these iconic designs are still in production today, being made in modern factories and subtly updated to